Teachers’ perception about a competence-based math program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60085/se.v4n1a3Keywords:
socioconstructivismo, percepción docente, motivación docente, educación matemática, competencia matemática, evaluación de impacto, métodos cuantitativos, efecto desbordamientoAbstract
Several studies have pointed to a disconnect between the curricular and theoretical approaches that promote a competency-based focus in mathematics education and the practices implemented in classrooms, which are still dominated by mechanical repetition and rote learning. Considering this gap, educational resources that include instructional guides with rich, process-centered mathematical activities represent a promising avenue for transforming teaching practice. However, their impact largely depends on how they are received and interpreted by teachers. This study analyzes teachers’ perceptions of Innovamat, a mathematics curriculum program with a socioconstructivist foundation, implemented across different educational stages. Based on two quantitative studies with more than 7000 participants, the program is generally viewed positively, especially in terms of student motivation and depth of learning. Moreover, the data show that experience with the program influences perception: the longer teachers use it, the more they tend to value it, particularly after one year of implementation. Perceptions of the program’s impact also increase during the first year—particularly regarding professional development—but tend to decline and stabilize over time. The results highlight the importance of attending to teachers' perceptions as a key element in the implementation of innovative educational initiatives. In this case, the program’s positive reception suggests favorable conditions for advancing toward a more meaningful, reflective, and competency-focused approach to mathematics education.
References
Alsina, Àngels. 2012. “Más allá de los contenidos, los procesos matemáticos en Educación Infantil.” Edma 0-6: Educación Matemática en la Infancia 1 (1): 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24197/edmain.1.2012.1-14
Alsina, Àngels. 2019. Itinerarios didácticos para la enseñanza de las matemáticas (6-12 años). Barcelona: Editorial Graó.
Baehre, Sonja, Michal O’Dwyer, Lorraine O’Malley, et al. 2022. “The Use of Net Promoter Score (NPS) to Predict Sales Growth: Insights from an Empirical Investigation.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 50: 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00790-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00790-2
Ball, Deborah Loewenberg. 1990. “Reflections and Deflections of Policy: The Case of Carol Turner.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 (3): 247–259. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012003247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012003247
Boesen, Jens, Ola Helenius, Erik Bergqvist, Tomas Bergqvist, Johan Lithner, Torulf Palm, and Birgitta Palmberg. 2014. “Developing Mathematical Competence: From the Intended to the Enacted Curriculum.” The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 33: 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.001
Brousseau, Guy. 1997. Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics.
Casey, Katherine, and Chris Sturgis. 2018. Levers and Logic Models: A Framework to Guide Research and Design of High-Quality Competency-Based Education Systems. iNACOL.
Charalambous, Charalambos Y., and George Philippou. 2010. “Teachers' Concerns and Efficacy Beliefs About Implementing a Mathematics Curriculum Reform: Integrating Two Lines of Inquiry.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 75: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9238-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9238-5
Cohen, David K., and Heather C. Hill. 2000. “Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California.” The Teachers College Record 102: 294–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810010200202
Freudenthal, Hans. 1973. Mathematics as an Educational Task. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2903-2_2
Freudenthal, Hans. 1991. Revisiting Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frykholm, Jeffrey A. 1996. “Preservice Teachers in Mathematics: Struggling with the Standards.” Teaching and Teacher Education 12 (6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00010-8
Fullan, Michael. 2007. “Change the Terms for Teacher Learning.” Journal of Staff Development 28 (2).
Gregoire, Michele. 2003. “Is It a Challenge or a Threat? A Dual-Process Model of Teachers' Cognition and Appraisal Processes During Conceptual Change.” Educational Psychology Review 15 (2): 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023477131081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023477131081
Hajesmaeel-Gohari, Sadrieh, Khordastan, Firoozeh, Fatehi, Farhad, Samzadeh, Hamidreza, and Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz. 2022. “The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health”. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 22 (1): 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
Hemmer, Pernille, and Mark Steyvers. 2009. “A Bayesian Account of Reconstructive Memory.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (1): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01010.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01010.x
Liljedahl, Peter. 2021. Building Thinking Classrooms in Mathematics, Grades K–12: 14 Teaching Practices for Enhancing Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Lithner, Johan. 2008. “A Research Framework for Creative and Imitative Reasoning.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 67: 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
Martins, Lurdes G., and Maria Helena Martinho. 2024. “Tipologia de Tarefas nos Manuais Escolares de Matemática: Um Estudo com Manuais Portugueses de 10.º e 11.º Ano.” Educación Matemática 36 (1): 66–91. https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3601.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3601.03
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Niss, Mogens, and Tomas Højgaard. 2019. “Mathematical Competencies Revisited.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 102 (1): 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2017. Marco de Evaluación y de Análisis de PISA para el Desarrollo: Lectura, Matemáticas y Ciencias. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pólya, George. 1945. How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828678
Remillard, Janine T. 2005. “Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula.” Review of Educational Research 75 (2): 211–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
Remillard, Janine T. 2012. “Modes of Engagement: Understanding Teachers’ Transactions with Mathematics Curriculum Resources.” In From Text to ‘Lived’ Resources: Mathematics Curriculum Materials and Teacher Development, edited by Ghislaine Gueudet, Barbara Pepin, and Luc Trouche, 105–122. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_6
Schoenfeld, Alan H. 2016. An Introduction to the Teaching for Robust Understanding (TRU) Framework. https://truframework.org/.
Shield, Malcolm, and Shelley Dole. 2012. “Assessing the Potential of Mathematics Textbooks to Promote Deep Learning.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 82: 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9415-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9415-9
Star, Jon R., and Gabriel J. Stylianides. 2013. “Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: Exploring the Gap Between Knowledge Type and Knowledge Quality.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 13: 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828
Valencia Álvarez, Ana B., and José R. Valenzuela González. 2017. “¿A Qué Tipo de Problemas Matemáticos Están Expuestos los Estudiantes de Cálculo? Un Análisis de Libros de Texto.” Educación Matemática 29 (3): 51–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24844/EM2903.02
Vilalta, Albert. 2021. “Un Proyecto para Desarrollar la Competencia Matemática en el Aula de Primaria.” Uno: Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas 92: 73–79.
Vilalta Riera, Albert, Jordi Deulofeu Piquet, and Laura Morera Úbeda. 2024. “Enriching Math Teaching Guides from a Competency-Based Perspective.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 20 (7): em2477. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14761
Downloads
Published
Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /home/revistae/public_html/lib/pkp/lib/vendor/smarty/smarty/libs/plugins/modifier.date_format.php on line 81
2025-12-18
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marc Colomer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is under Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.





